The repeated public support given by the president of the republic Andrés Manuel López Obrador to Alfredo del Mazo, despite the evidence that arises everywhere on an extension of the systematic looting of public resources, businesses under cover of power and widespread corruption in various Government areas, keeps the new head of the Atlacomulco group confident about the second report he will render this Tuesday at the Government Palace, but away from popular representation. In the purest style of his cousin and predecessor, Enrique Peña Nieto, Del Mazo will represent a report in a manner, surrounded by strong security measures and in front of the courts that pay him pleading, for being principal benefactors -public and private, in the short and in the wide-, of the businesses, contracts, awards in the manner, ghost companies, targeted deliveries (to simulated or false NGOs or firms owned by officials and former officials) with which power in the Estado de México is used, for 90 years, but with greater intensity since professor Carlos Hank Gonzáles imposed the clever way of getting “juice to power”.

But what will Alfredo del Mazo report? Will he talk about the mass fabrication of culprits, through rake operations across the territory, to disguise and build false statistics of advances in the pursuit of justice and in the dejection of insecurity, at the expense of hundreds or thousands of innocents?

Will he talk about the electoral distribution of social resources through the pink salary, for poor women, but without the required scope before the magnitude of the marginalization statistics, beyond his proyect to generate female proselytizing loyalties?

Will he talk about the systematic looting at the least since 2016, of the resources of the popular insurance program and will reveal to us in which accounts the billions of pesos that dissapeared in 2017 of the programs for health, for medicines, salaries, hospital insurance and furniture; or of those who were destined for reconstruction?

Will he present us the statistics of public and private organizations that reject and disapprove of the Estado de México in the fight against corruption? Or will they talk us about the simulation in terms of transparency, via signatures of collaboration agreements and visits by federal officials with whom they have entered into negotiations to continue perpetuating impunity or disguise it?

Perhaps, taking advantage of the audience, he will ask Gabriel O´shea Cuevas and his secretary of the comptroller´s office (involved in the acquittal of Enrique Peña Nieto in the case of the White House), how they negotiate with the consultancies and auditors -many submitted under threats-, the audits they present to the control bodies, with results in the manner and most with falsified or prefabricated data.

Maybe Mr. Lord is encouraged and explains us how the network of unconditional followers of the PRI operates and without ethics or scruples administered by all autonomous agencies of the Estado de México, as part of the fence that has been built to continue plundering the entity.

Maybe yes. Until the next time.

Staff

Translator: Víctor Colín